Tag Archives: Costa Rica

Costa Rica 2-1 Venezuela – International Friendly (27 May 2016)

International Friendly

Friday 27 May 2016 – Estadio Nacional de Costa Rica, La Sabana Metropolitan Park, San José, Costa Rica

Costa Rica 2-1 Venezuela

Video Highlights of Costa Rica 2-1 Venezuela, International Friendly, 27 May 2016 (YouTube)

First Half Provides Rare Light Despite Loss

Despite a positive start that saw them take the lead, a strong Venezuela line-up suffered their first defeat under Rafael Dudamel. 

In what was his third game in charge, the new manager was able to give minutes to Tomás Rincón and Salomón Rondón for the first time. These two men, the most high-profile pair of the current crop, started alongside other top players who had already received varying amounts of game-time in the new era, such as Juanpi, Rómulo Otero and Josef Martínez. Also given a chance from the off were Rolf Feltscher at left-back, who was making his first international appearance for three years and goalkeeper José Contreras, who had an opportunity to bolster his claim for the No.1 shirt.

The match began at a very promising pace with both sides stretching opposition defences, putting in a number of crosses as well as winning a similar amount of corners. Most of these balls into each box caused nerves rather than actual saves, though one exception was Otero’s 11th-minute ball that centre-back Wilker Ángel met with a strong header, albeit one that went straight at goalkeeper Patrick Pemberton.

Alas, in the opening 25 minutes there were more jitters generated than shots on goal. For example, in the 19th minute, a Costa Rican corner was knocked down awkwardly by a Venezuelan defender, causing a ricochet and then a collision between outfield player and goalkeeper as, after the ball was frantically cleared, Contreras was left momentarily down for the count. A few minutes later, Rincón broke up an attack in midfield and charged forward, supplying Otero on the left who put in a low ball that eventually fell to Martínez, who managed to turn but had his shot blocked. Shortly afterwards, a mix-up between Pemberton and a defender 35 yards from goal briefly gifted the ball to Rondón, but the West Bromwich Albion striker was unable to adjust his feet and positioning in time to capitalise on the error.

A moment of greater substance occurred not long afterwards when, in the 28th minute, a Costa Rican cross from the right was greeted by the left foot of Ronald Matarrita, whose wicked diagonal volley went just wide of the far post.

A minute later the hosts nearly made some headway when a through-ball was only narrowly cut out. However, just as they thought they were gaining momentum, they fell behind. Indeed, in a rapid turnaround, in the 29th minute Contreras rolled the ball out to Rincón, who passed short to Juanpi near the halfway mark. Seemingly with his next move already plotted in his head, the Málaga youngster turned and coolly slid the ball between the centre-backs to Martínez, who quickly squared the ball to Rondón to knock home from the edge of the area. It was a fine team goal, a rare direct team move and provides much optimism that future games will feature more of this creative, cutting attack play.

Eight minutes later, the lead was close to being doubled as an attack up the inside-left came infield, with the ball eventually slid through to Juanpi who turned and swerved a low shot just wide of the far post. Alas, it was to be the hosts who got the second goal of the game and, just like the first, it came from a West Brom player.

Also not entirely dissimilar from the first, it took many in the ground by surprise. Indeed, being at least 35 yards out, right-back Cristian Gamboa seemed a little ambitious to be sizing up for a strike at goal. However, his low, skimming shot somehow managed to find its way past Contreras, who appeared to have ample time to manoeuvre himself over to keep the ball out. Yet again, a Venezuelan goalkeeper struggles to confidently seize his opportunity between the posts.

The hosts could have actually gone into the break ahead as, on the stroke of half time, they were denied a legitimate goal. A fine diagonal long ball by Cristian Bolaños was controlled and knocked over Contreras to be headed in but – incorrectly – the offside flag was raised.

However, they were not to be denied for too long. Four minutes after the restart, substitute Ariel Rodríguez gained some space from Vizcarrondo on the left edge of the area. Facing away from goal he then hooked a fine strike that seemed to float over Contreras and into the top corner.

Venezuela were thus back in a familiar position. However, just before the hour-mark they really should have been on equal terms. Indeed, Juanpi again played a fine direct through-ball to Martinez who this time dinked it over Pemberton and into the back of the net. Yet, despite being at least level with the last defender, the linesman perhaps got him confused with the nearby Rondón and raised his flag for offside.

For the remainder of the game, neither side created much of note as the game gradually petered out, with the excessive number of substitutes inevitably taking their toll on proceedings.

Nevertheless, when the final whistle blew, though disappointed by the outcome, the first-half performance gave many Venezuelans considerable reasons to feel encouraged by the new era.  They had played at a tempo rarely seen in the past couple of years and, especially due to the inclusion of Juanpi and Otero, displayed a variety of attacking options not often at their disposal. Ultimately undone by a goalkeeping error and a fine golazo, the defence should not feel too downhearted by their performance as they again put in a relatively solid shift.

Ultimately, while one should try not to read too much into these three friendlies, the signs have been quietly encouraging. Win away to Guatemala on Wednesday (1 June) and expectations will be raised that La Vinotinto will actually be able to make a fist of qualifying out of Copa América Group C.

Team Selections

Costa Rica (5-1-3-1): P. Pemberton (L. Moreira, 46′); C. Gamboa, K. Watson, Ó. Duarte (F. Calvo, 51′), J. Acosta, R. Matarrita; C. Borges (Y, Tejeda, 63′); J. Campbell, B. Ruiz, C. Bolaños (J. Venegas, 60′); Á. Saborío (A. Rodríguez, 46′).

Venezuela (4-4-2): J. Contreras; A. González (V. García, 53′), W. Ángel, O. Vizcarrondo (S. Velázquez, 77′), R. Feltscher (M. Villanueva, 77′); Juanpi, A. Figuera (C. Santos, 74′), T. Rincón, R. Otero (A. Guerra, 53′); J. Martínez & S. Rondón.

Darren Spherical

@DarrenSpherical

Venezuela 1-0 Costa Rica – International Friendly (2 February 2016)

International Friendly

Tuesday 2 February 2016 – Estadio Agustín Tovar, Barinas

Venezuela 1-0 Costa Rica 

Video Highlights of Wilker Ángel’s goal in Venezuela 1-0 Costa Rica, International Friendly, 2 February 2016 (YouTube).

Wilker Ángel capitalised on a late goalkeeping howler to give Venezuela their first win for over seven months.

However, though ostensibly this long overdue victory came against World Cup quarter-finalists, little will have changed for under-fire manager Noel Sanvicente in the eyes of La Vinotinto’s frustrated public. Indeed, even before a ball was kicked, there was seemingly little at stake, with both nations’ squads drawn largely from their respective domestic leagues. Thus, Keylor Navas, Bryan Ruiz, Joel Campbell et al. were certainly not amongst the slain in Barinas.

Some of those that were instead selected for Los Ticos went some way towards aiding the home cause as, by the 65th minute, they were down to nine men following two dismissals. Despite this two-man advantage, familiar failings were displayed as the hosts struggled to create clear chances. Ultimately, it was to take further generosity from the visitors – in the form of experienced goalkeeper Marco Madrigal’s cack-handling – to save Sanvicente from media savagings – in the immediate aftermath, at least.

All the same, the game was at least an opportunity to break the winless streak, keep a rare clean sheet and for fringe/young players to demonstrate that they can handle wearing the burgundy shirt, if not put some additional pressure on their more illustrious, rebellious peers. While there were no storming performances, some players nevertheless stood out.

Ángel, for one, helped to keep things solid at the back and chipped in with his second international goal since making his debut in November 2014. Although he does not always convince in his defensive duties, with the first-choice centre-backs porous and, most pertinently, not getting any younger, further opportunities beckon.

With Fernando Amorebieta having resigned from the national set-up, this opens new possibilities at both centre-back and left-back. Indeed, throughout Sanvicente’s reign this spot on the flank has been contested mostly by the ex-Athletic Bilbao man and 31-year-old Gabriel Cichero (32 in April). Here as well, a vacancy is gradually emerging and Málaga youngster Mikel Villanueva did not do his prospects any harm in Barinas.

From an attacking perspective, two men were most prominent. Firstly, the man the majority of the Zamora-supporting crowd were most eager to see: 18-year-old nimble attacker, Yeferson Soltedo, scorer of an impressive 12 goals in 21 games in the local club’s recent championship-winning season. The volume was to rise whenever he picked up the ball. Without really getting a clear sight at goal, over the 90 minutes the fleet-footed forward looked the most likely to weave his way through the defence and either create or score a goal.

The other player of note to stand out was the more experienced Luis González, a 25-year-old dribbler who, particularly in the first half, niftily made space and put in the most testing balls.

Nevertheless, though the likes of González and Soteldo attempted to reward the vocal enthusiasm of the home faithful, the opening exchanges were familiarly tepid. It took 34 minutes until a shot hit the target and this came courtesy of the visitors’ Johan Venegas. Some space opened up for the Montreal Impact midfielder on the centre-right and his strike from 30 yards out troubled – perhaps unnecessarily – goalkeeper José Contreras who parried out. Immediately, Venezuela attempted to urge themselves into action and went straight down the other end, though Soteldo’s shot from outside the area went well wide. Around five minutes later, González created and fired the hosts’ first real attempt on goal, following a stepover with a low strike at the goalkeeper from the left of the area.

While the game was lacking in goal-mouth action, it was nevertheless keenly contested, with robust challenges of varying legality flying in. Just two minutes before half time, tensions got the better of Venegas who, to everyone’s surprise, suddenly received two successive yellow cards and was dismissed, presumably for comments aimed at the referee. As one of the most experienced players and likely threats for the Central Americans, his removal was a welcome boost for the hosts, but could they capitalise after the interval?

They tried, they certainly tried. Yet, lacking on-field familiarity and cohesiveness, most attacks in the opening 20 minutes after the restart were engineered by the likes of Soteldo and González creating space and then firing in balls to team-mates who were not always on the same wavelength. Then, in the 65th minute, even more space was afforded to them to make a crucial connection after another of their opponents’ stand-out players, David Ramírez, received his marching orders for a second yellow card.

Playing against nine men, Sanvicente would have known that nothing less than a win would suffice. Yet though his men did enjoy more of the ball and saw larger expanses of inviting green turf, Soteldo’s jinking runs were not punctuated with a finish and a stalemate seemed inevitable. Out of the blue, Costa Rica nearly thwarted this even this underwhelming narrative when, in the 84th minute, substitute Jordan Smith struck optimistically from 25 yards; his shot deflected, looped upwards and was then tipped over for a corner by Contreras.

Complete embarrassment and ignominy averted, Venezuela resumed their assault on Madrigal’s goal. The breakthrough, when it came with barely a minute left on the clock, came out of nowhere and was a gift that infuriated the Costa Rican coaching staff and match reporters alike. From a free-kick on the left, substitute Ángelo Peña whipped in a routine ball that bounced before Madrigal who, haplessly, was unable to catch it; instead, the ball rebounded off his upper body and was immediately headed past him by the alert Ángel.

Thus, in the short-term at least, a critical mauling was avoided and perceptions were rapidly re-assessed. It was the second time Sanvicente had managed Venezuela in Barinas under Sanvicente and the second time he had emerged victorious. However, both were in games featuring predominantly second- and third-string players and, barring further differences between the seniors and the FVF,  hardly any of these are likely to feature in the World Cup qualifiers next month. That is when the real action recommences and Sanvicente knows he needs solutions fast. Ultimately, he can take little from this match into March’s double-header, but he will be hoping he will at least be around long enough to take the likes of Soteldo and Ángel to further international heights.

 

Team Selections

Venezuela (4-2-3-1): Contreras; Faría, D. Benítez, Ángel, Villanueva; Figuera (Acosta, 78′), A. Flores (J. García, 90+4′); Soteldo, Johan Moreno (Ponce, 54′), L. González (Peña, 79′); Blanco.

Costa Rica (5-4-1): Madrigal; Miranda, Acosta, Mena (Smith, 78′), Waston, Francis; Colindres (Cunningham, 56′), Alvarado (Sánchez, 90+4′), Azofeifa (Valle, 76′), Venegas; Ramírez.

Darren Spherical

@DarrenSpherical

 

Preview for Venezuela’s February 2016 Friendly with Costa Rica

International Friendly 

Tuesday 2 February 2016 – Estadio Agustín Tovar, Barinas.

Venezuela vs Costa Rica

Trouble Abounds, Though Not In These Surrounds

lettervenezuela

Letter sent via Twitter by 15 leading Venezuelan players (source: numerous Twitter accounts)

On the evening of 30 November 2015, an open letter was simultaneously tweeted by several Twitter accounts that was to put the immediate future of Venezuelan football in serious jeopardy. Signed by 15 of the most senior and high-profile internationals – including Tomás Rincón, Salomón Rondón and Roberto Rosales – and later endorsed by many more in the national set-up, its stated grievances were chiefly with the country’s football association (FVF). The players were incandescent at accusations that they were conspiring to get their manager and his coaching staff the sack; instead, they said, it was their paymasters on high that they would like to see replaced and some new leadership installed. Coming as it did in the week preceding the ruling chavista factions’ biggest electoral setback in their 17 years of power, this digital missive certainly chimed with anti-establishment currents in the air.

However, despite the players’ collective denial, national boss Noel Sanvicente and his off-field team had little reason to feel any more content about the situation. Indeed, the letter did also express disappointment at their silence and seeming lack of support for the players after the charges were first levelled several days prior by FVF President Laureano González. As around the same time the experienced defender Fernando Amorebieta had announced his resignation from the international stage, citing differences with Sanvicente and co. along the way, speculation has been rife that player-coach relations are at their lowest this century. Some voices in the domestic media have suggested that some, if not all, of the signatories will never play under Sanvicente again, while others have hit the nuclear button entirely and called for coaches and FVF directors alike to wash their hands with the current generation and instead plan for Qatar 2022. Regarding this last point, with four consecutive defeats having inaugurated the preliminary road to Russia 2018, making long-term future planning paramount is a pressing concern that certainly pre-dates the letter’s publication.

Nevertheless, in a seeming admission that bridges behind the scenes need to be mended, if not re-built entirely, Sanvicente has been proactive in improving the situation. Firstly, within a day of the original letter, he issued his own lengthy response in which, amongst other things, he offered himself up as a mediator of sorts between players and directors and, crucially, stated that he had no reason to believe that they were plotting to oust him. He also acknowledged that on-field performances need vast improvement and that he accepts ultimate responsbility. Part two of his salvage operation began in early January as he travelled to Europe to meet up with some of the most high-profile players. Little of substance is known about what was said in these discussions but he did also have time to meet and get his photograph taken with the likes of Pep Guardiola and Luis Enrique. Unintentionally or otherwise, calling upon his contacts in this way may have provided something of a rebuff to critics who have called for this derided provincial, who has never worked outside his homeland, to be replaced with a foreign, and therefore supposedly more tactically sophisticated, manager. Ultimately, observers will probably have to wait until the next World Cup Qualifiers in late March to see if any progress has been made and a full-scale rebellion averted.

guardiolasanvicente

Venezuela manager Noel Sanvicente with Bayern Munich boss Pep Guardiola (Source: @SeleVinotinto)

Dissent Unlikely Here: The Current Squad

Indeed, as though in the meantime a friendly has been arranged, as it falls outside of official FIFA dates and clubs are not obliged to released their players, none of the 15 signatories feature in the crop to face Costa Rica in Barinas. Thus, rather than having to negotiate his way through cagey training sessions with wary, politicking professionals, Sanvicente’s squad is instead largely stocked with eager-to-impress domestic players (plus a couple of youngsters from abroad).  A fine opportunity for these upstarts to bolster the claims of those who want ridding of the supposedly traitorous seniors, some might say. However, this must be tempered by the fact that numerous Venezuelans who exhibit the faintest glimmer of future star potential are now snapped up by overseas clubs every single year. Indeed, eight of the home-based players called up for last year’s friendy double-header with Honduras have since moved abroad. These include the likes of Jhon Murillo (Tondela, on loan from Benfica, Portugal), Rómulo Otero (Huachipato, Chile) and Manuel Arteaga (Palermo, Italy) – precisely the kind of individuals who are in a strong position to become regulars in the upcoming years. This is without mentioning goalkeeper Alain Baroja (then at Caracas FC, now in Greece with AEK Athens), who made his debut in the first of these games and is now his nation’s number-one choice. At last count, several dozen players who have received international call-ups already ply their trade abroad, many of whom are barely in their twenties, so the current products of the nation’s ransacked domestic game are not necessarily the first people to look at when envisaging a brave new era.

Consequently, in the current squad there are a fair few journeymen, nearly men and youngsters for whom this call-up will probably count as a career highlight. Furthermore, Sanvicente can not call upon any players from Caracas FC – easily the country’s leading exporter of talent – as their players are set to play the first leg of a crucial Copa Libertadores playoff tie. Nevertheless, promise can still be found amidst their ranks.

20-year-old midfielder Carlos Cermeño has now had a couple of years of regular action for 2014/15 champions Deportivo Táchira and some anticipate that he will eventually bring some more composure and support for both defence and attack. Perhaps more exciting to the average spectator is attacker Yeferson Soteldo, who made his professional debut at 16 and really burst to prominence in 2015, scoring 12 goals in 21 games of Zamora’s Torneo Adecuación championship-winning season (this was a short transitional tournament to pave the way for a restructured domestic league). Still only 18, this fleet-footed, persistent finisher has already scored in 2016’s opening domestic fixture and has recently received recognition in British magazine Four Four Two. Arguably possessing the most potential of the lot – and who has, unsurprisingly, already been prised away from Venezuela – is 19-year-old striker Andrés Ponce. Having first excited preying eyes when netting seven goals at 2013’s South American Under-17s Championship (where his nation only narrowly finished second to Argentina on goal difference), he is now causing excitement in Italy. Indeed, possessing attributes not entirely dissimilar to those of one Salomón Rondón, his 16 goals in 2015/16 mean he is currently top-scorer in Italy’s Torneo Primavera, the country’s top youth division.

A Respite From Reality?

The plucky faithful of Estadio Agustín Tovar, home of Zamora, will be keen to see both Ponce and their very own Soteldo mark their international bows with goals, though the reception they reserve for their ex-manager may be of greatest interest. Indeed, Sanvicente led them to two consecutive championships between 2012 and 2014 and received a hero’s welcome – banners et al – this time last year for the second friendly against Honduras. Based on online opinion polls taken back in November, a substantial majority of Venezuelans think Sanvicente should go, but fans of his former clubs (particularly Caracas FC) have been amongst the most keen to defend him. Who knows, in the short run this friendly of seemingly spurious consequence may give him a much-needed morale boost and go some way to building bridges with fans, if not the players he will most likely be calling upon next month against Peru and Chile.

In the long run however, particularly with regard to on-field matters, coercing the domestic public – let alone neutral observers – into perceiving some significance in this encounter is a challenge that even most television subscription services would struggle to rise to. Facing a Costa Rica side also devoid of familiar names, this is not adequate preparation towards salvaging some pride in the World Cup qualifying campaign. Sanvicente – once again thwarted by the resources and, perhaps, the organisation of the FVF – would have preferred two friendlies like last year, but has had to settle with the one. Although a second clash with Los Ticos has provisionally been agreed, this will not take place until May (or not at all, if the two sides draw each other at the Copa América Centenario). Even so, two games with players drawn mainly from the depleted national league would surely have done little more than made several extra players aware of his methods – methods which, with each setback, lose the considerable clout they once possessed.

Ultimately, everyone, not least Sanvicente, knows the real work recommences in March. For now, the orders of the day are public relations, running the rule over some prospects and raising spirits – internally, if not externally.

Venezuela Squad

Goalkeepers: José David Contreras (Deportivo Táchira) and Luis Rojas (Deportivo La Guaira).

Defenders: Daniel Benítez (Deportivo La Guaira), Diego Melean (Zulia FC), Edwin Peraza (Zamora FC), Jhon Chancellor (Mineros de Guayana), Ángel Faría (Zamora), Mikel Villanueva (Atlético Malagueño), Óscar González (Deportivo La Guaira) and Wilker Ángel (Deportivo Táchira).

Midfielders: Carlos Cermeño (Dvo Táchira), Rafael Acosta (Mineros de Guayana), Arquímedes Figuera (Deportivo La Guaira), Luis González (Mineros de Guayana), Angelo Peña (Mineros de Guayana), Carlos Suárez (Carabobo FC), Javier García (Deportivo La Guaira), Arles Flores (Zamora FC), Johan Moreno (Zamora FC) and Yeferson Soteldo (Zamora FC).

Forwards: Richard Blanco (Mineros de Guayana), Andrés Ponce (Sampdoria) and Jesús Lugo (Aragua FC).

*Note: All teams for players correct at time of the squad’s announcement.

Darren Spherical

@DarrenSpherical

Q & A with David Freeman, Author of Barra Brava (A Latin American Football Journey)

Having recently finished reading Barra Brava, David Freeman’s envy-inducing account of his 18-month journey amongst a diverse range of Latin American football fans, Hispanospherical.com has been fortunate to be able to talk to the author. Following on from an introduction to his book, this extensive Q & A should be essential reading for anyone who has ever contemplated embarking upon a similar adventure.   

colombia4top

Game 18: Itagüí Ditaires (now Águilas Doradas) 4-0 Atlético Nacional, Copa Colombia Quarter Final First Leg, Estadio Atanasio Girardot, Medellin, Antioquia Department, Colombia, 15 September 2010. One of 67 games David Freeman attended in the Americas.

David Freeman’s Barra Brava is sold in paperback and/or Kindle format through Amazon’s many location-specific websites. To purchase a copy, click whichever link is most relevant to you: UK/Ireland, USA, Canada, Australia, Mexico, Brazil and Spain

Barra Brava: An Introduction

In the collective consciousness of most football fans outside of its vibrant orbit, Latin America is somewhat of a dichotomy. While it may harbour a tantalising cocktail of innovative skills and irrepressible passion, it is nevertheless very much on the periphery of the global footballing mainstream. Although hundreds of its exports to Europe’s opulent centre-stage regularly provide incalculable instances of the substantial reservoirs of talent that this vast region consistently produces, the awareness of the footballing cultures from whence they came leaves something to be desired. Indeed, the clubs, supporters and environments that initially helped to nurture many of these cracks exist in many imaginations as little more than a combination of crude, often unflattering stereotypes, as well as names – the latter of which are diminishing in stature with each passing year.

As the exodus of native talent shows no sign of abating and kick-off times in this area for spectators in the Old Continent tend to be either anti-social or clash with top-flight European matches, none of these leagues appear well-placed to redress this situation. Nevertheless, for many, the curiosity will always linger. After all, having witnessed the 2014 Brazil World Cup, in which several Latin American nations were well-represented in both the stands as well as on the pitches, how many fans idly daydreamed about experiencing some of these atmospheres first-hand?

Well, one man who has already done just that and on a scale that is surely the envy of football fans and cultural tourists the world over, is David Freeman. His book, Barra Brava, is an absorbing travelogue, chronicling an 18-month journey that began in October 2009. Starting off with a brief Latin-tinged spell in the United States watching the now-defunct Chivas USA, he then crossed the language-barrier to experience many of the sights, sounds and sensations of Latin America, culminating with one final linguistic hurdle in Brazil where the fun ended in April 2011. Along the way, he visited 18 different countries, watching no less than 67 live matches in 15 of them. With so much ground covered, Freeman was able to experience the footballing cultures of not only some of the area’s heavyweights, such as Argentina and Mexico, but also those of nations that most people would struggle to name a single international player from (Guatemala and Nicaragua, anyone?).

Bringing a modicum of order to complement the roaming devil-may-care spirit that often pervaded his travels, Freeman made it his mission to mix with as many local supporters as he encountered. With his accompanying England flag conspicuously signposting him as a figure of curiosity in the stands, he was able to use his ever-developing Spanish skills to learn about many varied fan groups, their matchday rituals and relationships with their clubs. Subsequently in print, he displays an admirable levelling of the playing field, relaying his experiences of the barra bravas of the likes of Boca Juniors, Santos and Club América in a similar manner to those of Motagua (Honduras), Deportivo Saprissa (Costa Rica) and Blooming (Bolivia).

Wherever he turned up, there were always songs, gestures and/or dances to first decode and then perhaps, when enough of his beverage of choice had been consumed, join in with. Yet, as readers will discover, it was not always to be plain sailing, with the tensions in the stands sometimes escalating into atmospheres markedly less hospitable towards this Englishman. Indeed, from finding himself on an Argentine pitch being booed by supporters less-than-impressed with his flag to requiring police intervention to restrain a knife-wielding Colombian youth, Freeman’s recollections often serve to caution, as much as to inspire, the prospective traveller.

Away from the stadiums, his explorations of a rather breathtaking range of locations were no less colourful, with every other page flowing with anecdotes and evocative descriptions. A rich diversity of experiences was evidently had, not least during a lengthy spell at a Mexican hotel situated by a nudist beach as well as, conversely, when teaching English in the poverty-stricken Nicaraguan capital of Managua, where he participated in some controversy-mired Independence Day celebrations. Furthermore, some of his more inquisitive forays included visits to the Mayan ruins in Central America, the idiosyncratic capitals of Panama City, Bogotá and La Paz, as well as the topological treasures of the Calchaquí Valleys in north-west Argentina.

As can be expected, invaluable nuggets of practical advice are scattered throughout this book, rendering it an essential primer for anyone thinking of embarking on a journey that encompasses even a fraction of the ground covered here. Freeman regularly takes into consideration such readers, particularly when providing what amounts to a mini-dictionary of Spanish words and phrases at the beginning of each chapter that can be used to ingratiate oneself with the locals.

So, if you like the sound of going on such a trip yourself or would simply like to read the adventures of someone who did, be sure to check out this book, the most latest edition of which has just been published. If, however, before making such an investment, you would prefer to know a little more, then as well as perusing the promotional website, please read on as Señor Freeman has recently been kind enough to answer some questions in detail, providing a considerable idea of what Barra Brava is all about.

flagsfinished

Q & A with David Freeman, author of Barra Brava

[Darren Spherical] Hello David, thank you for agreeing to answer some questions (and for providing so many photographs!). Your book provides countless entertaining vignettes and fascinating insights into various footballing cultures and societies in the Americas.

Prior to beginning your adventure, you mention that you worked for an internet bank and had not done a great deal of travelling. What motivated you to sell your house to embark on such an extensive and, at times, daunting journey? Also, why Latin America?

[David Freeman] My short answer is that I’d been bitten by the travel bug when I went to Australia and seven years on I needed to scratch the itch. The timing was all about personal circumstances, having been promised redundancy and not having responsibilities such as kids to worry about. Latin America was chosen based on learning Spanish and being able to communicate throughout two continents.

Regarding the book’s title, on your travels you met dozens of different groups of fans from over a dozen Latin American countries. Based on your observations, could you give an introduction to the barra bravas? How did they differ in some of the nations you visited?

I’d describe the barra as universally passionate people who support their club in a noisy, colourful and fanatical way. In my experience, barra bravas are not the same as hooligans because clubs like Pumas (Mexico) and LDU Quito (Ecuador) are supported by civilised, friendly students who had no interest in violence, but instead created atmospheres to compete with the most fervent in the world. Whilst I tried not to get involved in the seedy sides of any barra that I encountered, there could be no doubt that in certain places (mainly Colombia and Argentina) they were a public menace whose activities resulted in people dying every year.

At each ground you entered, you tried to get a photograph of yourself with your flag (an English St. George’s Cross emblazoned with the name of Birmingham City’s Zulu Army firm). How did you feel in such situations? Regarding some of the more negative responses, you must have feared for your own safety at times? 

A gringo waving a flag around always attracted attention from the locals but I found the majority to be friendly, particularly as I spoke Spanish and it was clear that I was as crazy about football as they were. In some places it was really intimidating waving a piece of cloth around that advertised that you were a vulnerable foreigner, but it proved to be a great ice-breaker amongst curious strangers. The numerous positive experiences with my St. George’s cross far outweighed an occasional negative one – plus the volatile situations made for the best stories!

    aztecapic flagonpitch

To see dozens more photographs of David with his flag at stadiums, click here.

Could you give any advice to future football tourists who wish to experience some of the colourful and raucous Latin American atmospheres without getting embroiled in any trouble? 

Simple: go in the main stand. At every ground I visited there was a tranquilo section that charged around twice as much to enter than the ‘popular’ terrace. This more expensive seating area had a far better view, superior facilities, good stewarding and was populated by reasonable people. If, however, you insist on mixing it up, I would repeat the point about being able to communicate with the natives and, above all, be wary of everything!

With regard to fan culture (pre-match rituals, songs/chants, dances, paraphernalia etc.), what were some of the most memorable things you observed and/or joined in with on your travels? 

Personally, I found the friendly beer-drinking culture whilst watching games in Mexico, Central America and Ecuador enjoyable. More universally, the fans consistently bouncing and singing, always admirably supported by musical instruments. Every club had at least one drummer, some even had horn sections (see this video compilation for some of the highlights of fans I encountered). Also, the socialising during play, aided by the open terraces, which is something that has been lost in the UK. This is in contrast to Germany, which is the leading nation in Europe with regard to atmosphere at domestic fixtures, driven by their affordable safe standing sections.

Moving away from the stands and onto the pitches, you saw many well-known players, some of whom were winding down their careers after spells in Europe and others who were emerging and have since gone on to play in the Premier League, La Liga, Bundesliga, Serie A and elsewhere. Who were you most excited to see and who left the most lasting impressions on you?

Juan Manuel Iturbe impressed me most as a 17 year old turning a match at the 2011 South American Youth Championship in Argentina’s favour against Chile. He made some stunning appearances in the Copa Libertadores before impressing for Hellas Verona and now finds himself at Roma.

Of the big players I watched live more than once:

Neymar won the Libertadores with Santos in 2011 scoring crucial goals throughout, although showcasing his ample array of skills and tricks at that level did not always benefit the team.

Juan Sebastián Verón’s passing at Estudiantes was masterful in Argentina’s Primera División.

Salvador Cabañas looked a class act for América in Mexico’s top-flight, though this was of course before he was tragically shot by a drug dealer.

Indeed, understandably he was never the same afterwards. Staying with on-field matters, what were some of the most memorable games and goals you saw?

The Clásicos were always the best value for money atmosphere-wise; the derbies in Mexico (Pumas 3-2 América, Game 3) and Colombia (Deportivo Cali 6-3 América de Cali, Game 24) lived up to the hype on the pitch. My favourite was bouncing among Universidad Católica’s fans in Buenos Aires as the Chileans scored three goals in the last 20 minutes to record a 4-3 Libertadores group stage victory away at Vélez Sarsfield (Game 51). There were also many dull games where la barra provided the entertainment.

Just under a quarter of the games you watched were in the North/Central American (CONCACAF) region, often in countries which many football fans will not have considered visiting. What did you make of the play, supporters and stadiums in this area?

Central America’s population were as passionate about football as those in the southern continent. Yet though, for example, Los Ticos defied the odds to reach 2014’s World Cup Quarter Finals, football in Central America was markedly inferior to the South American game. Though considered part of the North, Mexico was the region’s domestic powerhouse, aided in part in being alone in having some of its teams compete in the most prestigious club tournament in the Americas, the Copa Libertadores. Whilst the CONCACAF Champions League wasn’t a particularly competitive tournament, it did throw up some interesting ties, sending high-profile MLS sides and former European legends to remote places such as El Salvador. In my experience, the rural locations were really friendly and the atmospheres were brilliant, even at a Nicaraguan league final held in a baseball park.

guatemalaflag cobanpetapaguatemala nicaraguarealestelifirstleg nicaraguarealestelisecondgame

Football-related photographs from Central America (Click to Enlarge)

Outside of the stadiums in this area, you seemed to have rather diverse experiences, from the fun of Mexico to the comparative austerity of Nicaragua. Which places would you recommend to visitors to this region? 

Most visitors to this part of the world head to Cancún (Mexico) or Costa Rica, and the tourist industry outside of these places is still developing. I found every country to be fascinating and despite not receiving as many visitors, each had some fairly well-established attractions. These were mainly based around coasts, lakes, mountains and Aztec or Mayan historical sites. Panama City was one of the oddest capitals I’ve seen and there was an amazing sunset pretty much anywhere along the Pacific coast. Nicaragua would be my suggestion if you want to escape reality and don’t mind a chaotically relaxed experience. Compared to South, Central America is far cheaper on the ground and much less ‘discovered’, although air fares can be expensive.

teotihuacan hotelneptuno zipolitebeach puntacometamexicoguatemalariodulce eltuncoelsalvador semucchampeyguatemala nicaracaguacelebrations

Photographs from North/Central America (Click to Enlarge)

You watched 18 games in Buenos Aires (and 20 in Argentina altogether) in little over five weeks. As this is a footballing Mecca, what advice can you impart to anyone wishing to visit this city with similar intentions? 

Where possible, I would suggest buying your ticket in advance. Also, when I was there, the home fans were generally retained in the ground for 40 minutes after the final whistle, so going in the away end was preferable. However, as visiting fans have since been banned due to repeated problems with fan violence, there may be a wait before this advice can be put into practice again. Nevertheless, also make sure you use public transport to your advantage. From Central BA the train is best for Vélez, All Boys, Quilmes, Arsenal de Sarandí, Lanús and Argentinos Juniors; the Metro is convenient for River, San Lorenzo, Huracán and Atlanta; whilst the bus is quickest when visiting Boca, Racing and Independiente. Also, if you have the time and inclination, go to a smaller club in addition to Boca or River, as they can be far cheaper, friendlier and almost as spectacular. Finally, be wary of the alcohol exclusion zones around stadiums in Buenos Aires.

argentinosjrsoutside argentinosjrsmural lanusbuenosaires1 velezcatolicaatlanta2 riverargentinos1 elmonumentalriver1 estudiantesgodoycruz1independiente independientequilmes quilmesindependiente1 quilmesindependiente23

Football-related photographs from Buenos Aires Province, Argentina (Click to Enlarge)

Outside of Argentina, but remaining in South America, what were some of your highlights watching football in this particular continent? 

Colombia had the most edgy and memorable atmospheres. Ecuador was the friendliest, although my opinion is aided by the fact that they served beer in the grounds, plus Guayaquil and Quito were unexpectedly vibrant football cities. Asunción (Paraguay) was a little gem in the middle of nowhere which had a wonderful history. Iquique (Chile) had the best band I saw, complemented by a full brass section.

barcelonaemelec usanmartin monumentallima cienciano2 cienciano3 hernandosileslapaz iquiquecatolica nacionalparaguay museodelfutbolsudamericano santospalmeiras2 santospalmeiras3 maracanariodejaneiro

Football-related photographs from South America (Click to Enlarge)

Again, away from the football, what would you recommend to future visitors to the nations you travelled to in South America? 

Salar de Uyuni (Bolivia) was the most spectacular natural wonder I have ever seen and certainly guarantees some amazing photos. Generally speaking, Bolivia was cheap, friendly and diverse, with lots of unique tourist opportunities. Ecuador had easily accessible sights and offered the possibility of cycling from the Andes to the Amazon in a day. Colombia had rugged scenery as well as an attractive and cool population, although its reputation discourages many people. North-west Argentina’s vineyards and mountains were very pleasant and buzzing in the January I was there, as that is when many in Buenos Aires escape to the countryside.

cartagenapic tatacoadesert riopastaza alpacabolivia isladelsolbolivia deathroadbolivia salarbolivia1 salarjump salaranother llamasalar reggaefestival tafidelvalle  iquiquecity iquiquebeach morrodoisiramaos christtheredeemer

 Photographs from South America (Click to Enlarge)

On the subject of buying match tickets, it seemed that for the most part you showed up on matchdays without having pre-purchased them and yet, irrespective of what barriers you initially encountered, still managed to get in. As you appear to have acquired much know-how in this area, what advice can you impart?

Generally, I would advise showing up a couple of hours in advance, at which point you should be able to make a purchase and spend some time among the locals – most will be delighted that a gringo has chosen to watch their club. Face value prices were cheap – generally $5-10 in Central and South America, $10-12.50 in Argentina, whilst Brazil could cost as much as it does in the English Premier League. If you aren’t able to purchase a ticket in advance then touts are ever-present, although at the big Argentinian clubs you may have to pay tourist rates, which includes transport to the match (approximately $100 in 2011). Oddly, to watch Universitario in Lima – visit your local supermarket!

What were the most value-for-money places to live and/or watch football in? 

Buenos Aires is probably the world’s most exciting city to watch football in, and although accommodation isn’t cheap, public transport, food, drink and entrance fees are generally very reasonable – something I believe has continued as the Peso weakened in late 2014. Ecuador was probably best value in South America for watching top-level football, whilst accommodation and living in Central America was noticeably cheap. Conversely, Chile and Brazil were more expensive than the other countries I watched matches in.

While there was clearly much to be enjoyed on your journey, readers will discover that it was not always fun and games. Based on your experiences, if you wished to put someone off embarking on a similar adventure, what would you say to them?

Unless you go to a resort, Latin America isn’t somewhere that you can just turn up to without any preparation and then expect to have a great tourist experience. Considerations need to be made for the language barrier (hardly anyone speaks good English), the heat, the altitude and the distances you will be travelling within a limited transport network. If you like things going according to plan then this certainly isn’t your ideal destination, as nothing runs like clockwork. Also, it is important to accept that the locals will assume that you are rich and therefore you are likely to be a target. Although in my experience overcharging was the only real annoyance, I met many people who were robbed and subjected to violence, particularly in the big centres such as Lima and Quito. Peru, Colombia and Nicaragua’s capital, Managua, seemed to be the most dangerous places, but it is all subjective.

What is your interest in Latin American football like these days? Do you look out for any teams in particular? Finally, on a related note, what have you been up to since returning from your travels?

I have been following Latin American results on Soccerway, particularly Argentinos Juniors’ return to a reformed 30-team Primera División and Vasco da Gama battling back into Brazil’s top-flight. Also, although I feel there could be a lot more exposure on British TV, I have been enjoying this year’s Copa Libertadores on Premier Sports and will certainly also be watching the Copa América on the channel and/or YouTube – whichever is most convenient. On a personal note, in the past three years between working for a bank and marrying my Brazilian girlfriend, I’ve spent much of my free time writing and editing the book. The first edition totalled almost 120k words, though thankfully the latest version has been whittled down to 103k – apologies to anyone who bought a copy a couple of years ago! Ultimately, while it may not be perfect, I believe it is a decent travelogue.

David, thank you for giving up so much of your time to answer these questions and providing a taste of your experiences. Again, readers, if you would like to purchase Barra Brava in either paperback or Kindle format, click on whichever link is most relevant to your location: UK/Ireland, USA, Canada, Australia, Mexico, Brazil and Spain

If you have any questions for David Freeman, feel free to either reply to this article with them or, if you fancy the more direct option, he can be reached on Twitter under the account @TheBlueBarra

More From the Author

While Barra Brava is David Freeman’s first book, he has also written these articles on Latin American football, which may be of interest:

Fútbol in a Baseball Park, In Bed With Maradona, 15 February 2013. A detailed feature on the standard and status of football in Nicaragua, partially informed by his experiences of living there for four months as an English teacher.

Latin American Football 2012 in Review, Talking Sports, 2 January 2013. Covering the year following his travels, here is a summary of who won what in Brazil, Argentina, Peru, Colombia, Peru, Ecuador, and Mexico.

My Trip to Brazil: A Year of Expectation, Football Friends Online, 17 June 2014. Craftily combining a pre-World Cup trip to meet his Brazilian girlfriend’s family with a football detour or three, Freeman visited the Mineirão, Estádio Independência and, of course, the Maracanã.

Darren Spherical

@DarrenSpherical

Article originally published on 6 June 2015.

Preview for Venezuela’s February 2015 Friendly Double-Header with Honduras

Friendly International Double-Header

4 February 2015

Honduras vs Venezuela

Estadio Olímpico Metropolitano, San Pedro Sula 

11 February 2015 

Venezuela vs Honduras

Estadio Agustín Tovar, Barinas 

Less Prestigious Than Friendlies?

This international double-header between two nations represented by players from their respective domestic leagues (plus three MLS stars, in the case of Honduras) would be more accurately defined as a pair of ‘B’ internationals. Indeed, approximately three-quarters of a typical, fully fit Venezuela squad tends to consist of players based overseas. Even from the pool of home players, coach Noel Sanvicente has been partially thwarted in his attempt to watch the best local talent at close-quarters as the dates of these two matches coincide with Deportivo Táchira’s two Copa Libertadores play-off games against Paraguayan giants Cerro Porteño. From the side from San Cristóbal, he would have likely called up young centre-back Wilker Ángel (who scored on his debut against Bolivia in November), jinking midfielder Yohandry Orozco (who also featured against El Verde), as well as Gelmin Rivas (the highest scoring Venezuelan in the domestic league). Consequently, as these games are going to be contested by players who are largely unlikely to even feature again on the same field together for their country, it is a struggle, at least from tactical and team-building perspectives, to justify their arrangement.

The Managers:

Any Preparation Time is Invaluable

It may well prove that what the respective managers gain from proceedings will not be readily discernible to the majority of spectactors, as this may consist of learning who they feel they can trust, who are most receptive to their ideas and/or who shows the most potential in training.

For Honduras, these will be the first two games under the stewardship of Colombian coach Jorge Luis Pinto, last seen in the dugout by a mass audience guiding Costa Rica to a remarkable Quarter-Final finish in the 2014 World Cup. It remains to be seen whether he opts for the defence-minded counter-attacking approach that he utilised with Los Ticos when leading this particular Central American nation who generated some headlines of their own in Brazil – though largely for their rather physical play on and off the ball. With both squads mostly containing home-based players he does, arguably, have an advantage over his opposite number as he possesses some first-hand insights into Venezuelan football. Indeed, for almost a year and a half prior to taking the Costa Rica job, he was the coach of Deportivo Táchira and ended his reign with great success by winning the 2010-11 championship. Thus, as neither nation has called upon any of their emerging prospects from their U20 contingents – both of which having been recently preoccupied with their respective regional tournaments – he should have some familiarity with the majority of the Venezuelan side.

That is not to say his counterpart Sanvicente is completely in the dark regarding his opponents, as eight of the World Cup squad remain, including the MLS trio of Luis Garrido, Jorge Claros and Óscar Boniek García. Although attaining positive results may not be the primary purpose of such games, he will, however, surely be looking to gain at least one victory from the double-header. The man they call ‘Chita’ may have received much goodwill upon taking the job in July but, even though he has encountered some bad luck with injuries, having lost all four of the games he has overseen* he has certainly not been without criticism. A win then, irrespective of the personnel and methods used to achieve it, would give him some breathing space and surely boost morale amongst both the playing and coaching staff.

Venezuela’s Players

A Rare Opportunity for the Majority

In all, Venezuela have officially lost their last five games, with the first in this dismal sequence coming last March against Honduras in the same ground the first game will be played this time around. From this 2-1 defeat that featured many squad regulars, only Rómulo Otero – who started and scored a fine free-kick – and Arquímedes Figuera – who came on for little more than five minutes –  have been selected in the current crop.

Thus, it seems that Venezuela’s players, at least, will be very unfamiliar with their Honduran counterparts (and, depending on how much insight Pinto can impart, vice versa), not to mention somewhat unacquainted with one another. Indeed, this 20-man, largely makeshift, squad has been chosen from 10 different teams and the majority of these players have only really been together for a three-day series of training modules (from 19-21 January). Unless several players have an abnormal telepathic understanding, one thing that should not be expected from the Venezuelan players is free-flowing passing movements and creativity.

Nevertheless, while in this squad there are players who have little hope of a call-up to June’s Copa América squad and others who are frankly making up the numbers, approximately one-third have been previously selected at some point in the Sanvicente era. The majority of these are not regular starters but will most probably find themselves in the line-up next to players who they are unlikely to ever begin a competitive international with. Though their interplay and partnerships with most of their team-mates will not be utilised in future matches, they will nevertheless be under scrutiny with regards to their performances and how faithfully they carry out the coach’s instructions.

Thus, with all these caveats out of the way, what follows is a brief look at some aspects of La Vinotinto‘s side to look out for in these two games:

What to Look out for in the Venezuelan Side

How the Goalkeepers Perform

With Rafael Romo and Alain Baroja in the squad, both will likely feature at some point and, quite probably, receive 90 minutes each. With number one choice Dani Hernández having recently moved from the Real Valladolid substitutes’ bench to the Tenerife first team, seemingly only a severe loss of form on his part could see either of these men take his place between the sticks on a regular basis. However, it is not entirely clear who is the favoured stand-in, as neither have played in this new era. Although Romo – unlike Baroja – received a call-up to the last squad in November, he has been known to make the odd glaring error (as most recently witnessed at the weekend for his club side, Mineros de Guayana). His rival from Caracas FC perhaps benefits from playing for a more in-form club though he has himself made some impressive saves lately, yet in terms of goals conceded this season, there is little to separate the two men. The argument is unlikely to be settled by these two games, though they may go some way to suppressing it for the foreseeable future.

How the Defence Copes

This consideration may well be included in every Venezuela preview until at least when the upcoming World Cup Qualifying campaign ends. While Romo and/or Baroja will do well to avoid making any of the handling and positioning errors of Hernández, it is more the back four and the defensive-midfield partnerships that have been at fault in recent matches.

In Sanvicente’s four games as manager, his side have conceded 13 goals (*14 officially – see footnote), being frequently bypassed with ease in midfield and slow, not to mention disorganised, when dealing with through-balls and crosses. Left-back Gabriel Cichero – who is the only player in this squad to have faced Costa Rica under Pinto in a 2-0 loss back in December 2011 – has the unfortunate distinction of having started all of these games. He was not alone in his errors, but many fans did reserve for him their sternest opprobrium. Yet Sanvicente may well find his experience and know-how at this level invaluable, as he will likely be lining up with three other defenders who have little chance of playing much competitive international football. One possible defensive colleague, Juan Fuenmayor, who can operate at either left-back or in central defence, may have a couple-dozen caps to his name but the last of these came as a last-minute substitute four years ago and, more to the point, at 35 years old, age is not on his side. Cichero’s organisational and leadership capacities may be especially required when, as is likely, he finds himself in a back-line with Francisco CarabalíAndrés Sánchez and/or Jhon Chancellor who, between them, have a mixture of little and no senior international experience.

In front of the back four, when everyone is fit and available, Sanvicente appears to favour a defensive-midfield partnership of converted Málaga right-back, Roberto Rosales, and new captain, Tomás Rincón of Genoa. Although he has only ever been able to field this pairing once, when both men are available, the players in the current set-up have no chance of dislodging them. Indeed, when two players from the domestic league – Édgar Jiménez and Rafael Acosta – began the 5-0 thrashing meted out by Chile in November, both were hopelessly and repeatedly left for dead, unable to cope with the pace and movement of players from vastly superior leagues. Acosta also started but was to fare little better in the subsequent 3-2 defeat by Bolivia and so it was readily apparent, if it was not already, that the players who are used to competing in Europe’s top leagues were far better suited to these positions. Nevertheless, Acosta survives to live another day and is in this squad, though rather than looking to push for a regular first-team place, he should be more concerned with preserving his status as a fringe player in the squad. Franklin Lucena, who came on as a substitute for Acosta against Chile and replaced Jiménez in the line-up for the Bolivia game, would appear to be his most likely competitor from this pool of players to be first-choice stand-by, though again, turning 34 later this month, he does not appear to have much of a long-term future.

Rómulo Otero’s Role as an Attacking Threat

In the Sanvicente era, a recurring theme has been the inability of the attacking players to effectively and consistently link up and create chances. While this may be partly explained away by the changes in personnel that have occurred from game-to-game in these positions, it is nevertheless a concern. From their overseas contingent, Venezuela do not lack players of considerable talent who can play in the line behind the forward(s), with talents at their disposal including Luis Manuel Seijas, Juan Arango, Alejandro Guerra, rising star Juanpi and even, if required, Mario Rondón (who has been more accustomed to playing further forward). Thus again, the players in the current squad have quite a job on their hands with regards to attempting to gain a first-team place, though if anyone can do it, Rómulo Otero is surely the man. The Caracas FC starlet made substitute appearances against Chile and Bolivia, impressively assisting Alexander González’s goal against the latter with a swiftly executed lofted diagonal ball. With teams from abroad interested in him for some time now, and at the age of just 22 being the most internationally experienced attacking midfielder in this particular side, there should be some onus on him to impose himself in the games and be the catalyst going forward.

Elsewhere in this area, it will be interesting to see what Luis Vargas can offer, having played a key role in Zamora FC’s resurgence in form and subsequent ascent to the top of the Torneo Clausura.

How the Forwards Fare

At the very top of the field, not one of the forwards called up in previous match squads has come from the domestic league and the highest-scoring Venezuelan at home – Gelmin Rivas – is not even available for this clash. So what hope do this crop have of even being in with a chance of a place in a future squad for a competitive match?

Some focus will be on Jesús Lugo, a one-club man of only 23, who has been impressive creating and scoring chances in Aragua FC’s ascent to the outskirts of the title race and has U20 international experience. Despite being classified as a forward, he does tend to play a deeper role, offering support for the main goalscorer(s) and often finding himself in more of an attacking midfield position – an already highly competitive area in the selección, as noted.

When it comes to more traditional goal-getters, though Caracas FC’s Edder Farías has a respectable scoring record, he will turn 27 in the spring and yet has less than ten caps to his name. More long-term potential may come from taking a chance on Manuel Arteaga, a 20-year-old who has already scored twice in the Clausura for his new club Zulia FC, demonstrating strong composure when presented with one-on-one opportunities. He has previously had trials with Liverpool and Fiorentina, as well as a non-playing stint with Parma, so if his good form continues at club level, he may well earn a move abroad and find himself more in contention for future call-ups.

Ultimately, with the likes of Salomón Rondón, Mario Rondón, Josef Martínez, Miku and Juan Falcón all playing in strong European leagues, it will not be easy for any domestic forwards to find a spot in the first-choice squad, an issue faced by most players in this crop, irrespective of position. With so many reserves (and reserves to the reserves) on display, it is undeniable that these two meetings have the feel of being of less significance than even regular friendly games are generaly perceived. Nevertheless, as the games were hastily arranged at short-notice to give the managers some much-needed preparation time ahead of their respective continent-wide tournaments in June/July, it can be safely assumed that Sanvicente and Pinto view them as far from pointless.

20-man Venezuela Squad for the double-header against Honduras

Goalkeepers

Alain Baroja (Caracas FC)

Rafael Romo (Mineros de Guayana)

Defenders

Francisco Carabalí (Caracas FC)

Jhon Chancellor (Deportivo Lara)

Gabriel Cichero (Mineros de Guayana)

Juan Fuenmayor (Deportivo Anzoátegui)

Andrés Sánchez (Caracas FC)

Midfielders

Rafael Acosta (Mineros de Guayana)

Arquímedes Figuera (Deportivo La Guaira)

Argenis Gómez (Trujillanos FC)

Luis González (Deportivo La Guaira)

Óscar González (Deportivo La Guaira)

Franklin Lucena (Deportivo La Guaira)

Rómulo Otero (Caracas FC)

Luis Vargas (Zamora FC)

Forwards 

Manuel Arteaga (Zulia FC)

Richard Blanco (Mineros de Guayana)

Edder Farías (Caracas FC)

Jesús Lugo (Aragua FC)

Aquiles Ocanto (Carabobo FC)

*Venezuela’s match with Japan on 9 September 2014 ended 2-2 on the day but was later awarded as a 3-0 victory to Japan. Read more about it here.

Darren Spherical

@DarrenSpherical

El equipo juvenil de Venezuela sub-20 gana la medalla de plata

(This article was originally written in English. To read it, click here.) britain1 usaflag

Ayer, 28 de noviembre de 2014, el equipo sub-20 masculino de Venezuela recibió la medalla de plata en los XXII Juegos Centroamericanos y del Caribe, quedando subcampeones tras México, la nación anfitriona, que acabaron cómodos ganadores con un 4-1 en la final.

Este resultado supone un contraste con el rendimiento de La Vinotinto en su camino hacia la final, puesto que progresaron habiendo llegado al primer puesto de su grupo tras una victoria de 4-0 sobre Haití, un 1-0 sobre Costa Rica y después un empate sin goles contra Cuba. Posteriormente se encontraron con Honduras en la semifinal y los vencieron 1-0 gracias a un temprano penalti de Jhon Murillo del Zamora.

Aún así, por varias razones, los jóvenes venezolanos no deberían sentirse demasiado desanimados por la final y un aspecto al que se le debe prestar una breve atención aquí es la diferencia de edad de las alineaciones titulares del encuentro. En efecto, sus oponentes no sólo eran el equipo oficial Mexicano sub-21 si no que también había, de media, una brecha de más de dos años entre los dos conjuntos – una diferencia que, en muchas competiciones internacionales, habría visto a los equipos separados y colocados en distintas categorías de edad.

Es bastante notable el hecho de que el venezolano de más edad para empezar, el defensor de Caracas Jefre Vargas (nacido el 12/01/95), es más joven que el más joven de los mexicanos nombrado en la alineación de los oponentes, el jugador del torneo, Jonathan ‘Jorge’ Espericueta (nacido el 09/08/94).

Además, el jugador más mayor en la alineación de El Tri era Erick Torres (nacido el 19/01/93), un hombre que tiene una tasa de 1 gol cada 2 juegos para el equipo de la MLS Chivas USA – donde ha estado como préstamo durante casi un año y medio por el equipo mexicano superior en prestigio – y quien también marcó el gol ganador para su selección contra Panamá en Octubre. Es más de tres años y nueve meses mayor que los dos jugadores más jóvenes que empezaron el juego para La Vinotinto: Jefferson Savarino del Zulia y Andrés Ponce del Llaneros de Guanare (los dos compartiendo la fecha de nacimiento del 11/11/96), el último de los cuales tuvo algunas impresionantes actuaciones y fue el máximo goleador de su equipo con cuatro goles.

Muchas más observaciones se pueden recoger de la información proporcionada en la tabla inferior, pero seguramente la conclusión más relevante que se puede hacer es que el progreso de este equipo juvenil venezolano hasta la final ofrece mucho optimismo para el futuro.

mexvenesp3

Se debe tener en cuenta que todas las edades de los jugadores han sido redondeadas al mes más cercano, dependiendo de su fecha de nacimiento en relación con el partido jugado el 28/11/14. Por lo tanto, si un jugador ha vivido más de 15 días en un nuevo mes, su edad ha sido redondeada. Por ejemplo, José Marrufo, habiendo nacido el 12/05/96 tenía 18 años, 6 meses y 16 días el día del partido y por lo tanto su edad ha sido redondeada a 18 años y 7 meses. Si alguien lo desea es libre de crear una comparación más precisa, aunque es sospechable que el promedio de diferencia entre los dos equipos no cambiaría por más de un mes o así, reafirmando por lo tanto que hay una brecha de aproximadamente dos años entre los dos conjuntos.

Darren Spherical

@DarrenSpherical

Traducido por:

Susana Spherical

Venezuela’s Youthful Sub-20 Team Win Silver

(Si prefieres leer este artículo en español, haz click aquí) venezuelaflag Spain

Yesterday, 28 November 2014, Venezuela’s male Under-20 side were awarded the silver medal at the XXII Central American and Caribbean Games, finishing runners-up to host nation Mexico, who ran out comfortable 4-1 winners in the final.

This result came in contrast to La Vinotinto‘s form on their route to the final as they progressed having topped their group following a 4-0 victory over Haiti, a 1-0 win over Costa Rica and then a goalless draw against Cuba. Subsequently, they met Honduras in the semi-final and defeated them 1-0 thanks to an early penalty from Zamora’s Jhon Murillo.

However, for a variety of reasons, Venezuela’s youngsters should not feel too downhearted about the final and one aspect that shall be given some brief attention here is the age-difference between the starting line-ups for the game. Indeed, not only were their opposition officially the Mexican Under-21 team but also there was, on average, a gap of over two years between the two sides – a difference that, in many international competitions, would see the teams separated and placed in different age categories.

Quite notable is the fact that the oldest Venezuelan player to start, Caracas defender Jefre Vargas (born 12/01/95), is younger than the youngest Mexican named in the opposition line-up, the player of the tournament, Jonathan ‘Jorge’ Espericueta (born 09/08/94).

Furthermore, the very oldest player in El Tri‘s line-up was Erick Torres (born 19/01/93), a man who has a strike-rate of 1 goal in every 2 games for MLS side Chivas USA – where he has been on loan for nearly a year-and-a-half from the more prestigious Mexican side – and who also scored the winner for the full national team against Panama in October. He is over three years and nine months older than the two joint-youngest players who began the game for La Vinotinto: Zulia’s Jefferson Savarino and Llaneros de Guanare’s Andrés Ponce (both sharing a date of birth of 11/11/96), the latter of whom put in some impressive performances and was his side’s top-scorer with four goals.

Plenty more insights can be gleaned from the information provided in the table below, but surely the most signficant conclusion to make is that the progress of this youthful Venezuelan side to the final offers much optimism for the future.

mexveneng2

Please note that all ages of the players have been rounded to the nearest month, depending on their date of birth in relation to the game played on 28/11/14. Thus, if a player has lived more than 15 days into a new month, their age has been rounded up. For example, José Marrufo, having been born on 12/05/96 was 18 years, 6 months and 16 days old on the day of the match and so has had his age rounded up to 18 years and 7 months. If anyone wishes to create a more precise comparison feel free, though one suspects that the average age-difference between the two sides would not change by more than a month or so, thus re-affirming that there was a gap of approximately two years between the two teams.

Darren Spherical

@DarrenSpherical